Skip to content
Context Ranger CR markCRContextRanger

Reporting across the expanding context window.

Cursor takes marketplace offline after malicious extension targets 5,000 users
Model releases

Cursor takes marketplace offline after malicious extension targets 5,000 users

A tampered Claude Code extension attempted data theft and remote access, prompting Cursor to temporarily suspend its entire extension marketplace.

Depth
11 hoursThe malicious extension was live for approximately 11 hours before detection · reported
5,000 usersUp to 5,000 users were potentially affected by the compromised software · reported
1 outlet · newest source 242h ago

Key points

  • The malicious extension was live for approximately 11 hours before detection.
  • Up to 5,000 users were potentially affected by the compromised software.
  • Cursor confirmed no other extensions in the marketplace were impacted.

Cursor temporarily disabled its entire VS Code extension marketplace on Thursday after discovering a tampered version of the Claude Code extension, according to The Decoder. The company stated that the malicious package was available for about eleven hours and may have affected up to 5,000 users. Anthropic confirmed it had no involvement in the development or distribution of this specific compromised extension.

Evidence: reportedMalicious Claude Code extension in Cursor's marketplace attempted remote access and data theft

aifleet-decoder

Evidence: reportedMalicious Claude Code extension in Cursor's marketplace attempted remote access and data theft

aifleet-decoder

What it does

The tampered extension attempted to harvest specific system information from infected machines, including hostname, username, operating system details, and public IP addresses. It also tried to establish remote access channels for the attacker. Cursor noted that the remote access component likely failed on most systems because it required administrative privileges to execute successfully.

How to get it

The compromised software was distributed through Cursor’s official VS Code extension marketplace. Users who installed the extension during the eleven-hour window when it was live were exposed to the threat. Cursor subsequently removed the specific extension and took the entire marketplace offline to ensure no other compromised packages remained.

Limits

The attack’s effectiveness was constrained by system permissions. Cursor reported that the remote access attempt likely would not have worked on most machines due to the requirement for admin privileges. Additionally, the exposure window was limited to approximately eleven hours before the company detected the anomaly and initiated mitigation procedures.

Evidence: reportedMalicious Claude Code extension in Cursor's marketplace attempted remote access and data theft

aifleet-decoder

The takeaway

Cursor worked with external providers to neutralize the malware and confirmed there was no further risk before reinstating the marketplace. The company stated that no other extensions were affected by this incident. This event highlights the potential for supply chain attacks within developer tool ecosystems, even when using official distribution channels.

Building on this

Data science teams should audit their extension installations, particularly those granting system-level access, to ensure they originate from verified publishers. Since the malicious extension attempted to collect hostnames and IP addresses, organizations should monitor for unauthorized outbound connections from development environments. Teams should verify that extensions like Claude Code are sourced directly from Anthropic or authorized distributors, as third-party tampering can occur even in curated marketplaces.

Why it matters

  • Developers using Cursor must verify extension integrity, as official marketplaces can host tampered packages that steal system metadata.
  • The requirement for admin privileges limited the remote access impact, suggesting that least-privilege configurations can mitigate some post-exploitation techniques.
  • The 11-hour exposure window indicates that rapid detection and marketplace suspension are critical controls for containing supply chain compromises.
  • Teams should treat extension installations as high-risk operations, especially when they request system information like hostnames or public IPs.

Topics: Cursor, Anthropic, extension security, supply chain attack, developer tools

Updated

Ask the article

Local keyword search of this article; no generated answers.

Did this article give you the evidence you needed?

No vote saved on this device.
Your choice stays on this device. No public tally.

Questions readers ask

Did Anthropic create the malicious extension?

No, Anthropic stated it had no involvement in developing the tampered Claude Code extension found in the Cursor marketplace.

How many users were affected?

Cursor reported that up to 5,000 users may have been affected by the tampered extension during its 11-hour availability.

Was the entire marketplace compromised?

Cursor stated that no other extensions were affected and reinstated the marketplace after confirming there was no further risk.

Connected stories

This storyClaude Console beta lets orgs restrict API access to specific IPs to block unauthorized requestsClaude Console beta lets orgs reAnthropic Eyes $100B IPO Amid $430B Cloud Debt to Big Tech GiantsAnthropic Eyes $100B IPO Amid $4AI in parenting and romance sparks user doubt ahead of Anthropic’s listingAI in parenting and romance sparAnthropic's Cyber Verification Program locks Opus 5.5 security tools to Glasswing partners, halting RE workflowsAnthropic's Cyber Verification P

Reading receipt

  • The malicious extension was live for approximately 11 hours before detection.
  • Up to 5,000 users were potentially affected by the compromised software.
  • Cursor confirmed no other extensions in the marketplace were impacted.
Time spent: 0:00 · Depth: Full

Sources

  1. The Decoder

Related stories

Background reading